Do you want to be informed on new Posts on this Thread? (members only)
S&S Swan General - 1972 Swan 40 mast |
---|
Join Date: 10 May 2009
Posts: 2 |
||
---|---|---|
1972 Swan 40 mast |
Join Date: 03 March 2007
Posts: 241 |
||
---|---|---|
Good Question. I am looking forward to the reponse from Lars. I should also be considering this for our lady. Starting to see some corrosion.
|
Join Date: 02 January 2008
Posts: 1547 |
||
---|---|---|
Dear Ross and Mike
|
Join Date: 03 March 2007
Posts: 241 |
||
---|---|---|
Thanks Lars,
|
Join Date: 30 January 2007
Posts: 461 |
||
---|---|---|
Hi guys, please do not feel insulted because I am just friendly joking but: |
Join Date: 10 May 2009
Posts: 2 |
||
---|---|---|
Dear Ross and Mike You are right that rigs are taller now. You could either stay with the masthead concept, or go fractional. In some cases the foretriangle has been retained, and only the mainsail luff extended. If the extension then is a metre or so you can probably still tension the forestay with the backstay, if you go higher the runners will be essential for getting a tight headstay. There are various criterions for how much extension to choose - appearance, stiffness in a blow, light weather performance, achieving same characteristics as some known boat, etc. Assume you will go to double spreaders, then the chainplate dimensions need to be checked as the load distribution in the shrouds changes, and different shroud sizes are probably required. Kind regards Lars Thank you so much for the input-all good points and plenty to think about.I will also ask Nautor Swan what they recommend.
Sailing on the Swan river between Perth and Fremantle |
- Threads : 1701
- Posts : 10215
- Members: 820
- Online Members: 0